Thursday, January 26, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Chapter 3
While reading chapter three, I became engrossed in the idea of people only having to Photoshop themselves into an already photographed location and saying that they have visited that place. This is all so unreal. Will some people even travel anymore, or will they just Photoshop themselves standing in front of the Parthenon? So many places have been visited and photographed that anyone could do this. There will always be that wondrous feeling of standing in front of a historical building or landscape, but will people continue to seek that out?
Ritchin also discusses the proposal of a “not-a-lens” icon on manipulated images. I think that this could be either extremely beneficial or possibly hazardous. In fashion magazines and commercials it would be beneficial to recognize that the figure has been Photoshoped to be skinnier, or a product made more colorful. However what if you were to see that icon in the bottom corner of a picture in National Geographic or Newsweek. One might question what was manipulated in the photograph, or if it even is real. It would be alarming to see an image of war with that icon in the bottom, because what would be real and what would be fabricated?
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Ritchin: After Photography
After reading the first two chapters in Fred Ritchin’s After Photography I began to question the truthfulness in today’s photography. Images that we see in magazines and newspapers we assume to have actually happened at some point in the past. Whether they are a real place, person or object is now not as certain. How do we know that an image is not just a compliment of other images to create the perfect setting or person that they are unable to find in real life? Such as photographer Brian Walski who was fired from the Los Angeles Times after it was found that he combined multiple images of the war in Iraq to create what he believed a better depiction. There has even instances when companies will combine facial features of multiple women to create a virtual woman who they believe to be an image of ideal beauty. After reading Ritchin, I wonder how many of the images that I see on a daily basis in magazines and advertisements are real and how many are fabricated to deceive the viewer. Personally, I try to do as little retouch on my photographs as possible, because after a certain point I feel as though it is no longer a true representation of the original image but rather its digital counterpart.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Past Work and Inspiration

As a photographer I find that I am always being pulled into nature. I find it intriguing that something we encounter everyday can be so mysterious and at times unnerving. In past projects I have been drawn in close to examine the details that reside in leaves and trees to try and dismantle their intricate being. While this has been my primary method, during the course of this class I am going to try and take a step back to see nature in a much broader view. To see it in a larger scale as compared to diminutive. One such artist who has been a great source of inspiration is Robert Glenn Ketchum. As a conversationalist photographer he has had a large impact in the needs to preserve some of the worlds most beautiful scenery. Much of his work is large scale aerial images which helps to emphasize the vast beauty of the landscape.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















